Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Topband: 160m noise

To: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>,"TopBand List" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: Topband: 160m noise
From: "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com>
Reply-to: jmaass@columbus.rr.com
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 06:59:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: topband-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Jim Brown
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 1:15 AM
> To: TopBand List
> Subject: Re: Topband: 160m noise
> 
> 
> 
> For 160, a very effective choke can be made by winding approximately 10 turns 
> around 
> a 2.5" OD #43 toroid. Fewer turns are needed for higher bands, and the choke 
> that 
> works on 160 will be ineffective on higher bands due to stray capacitance 
> between the 
> windings. So if you work all HF bands you will need multiple chokes in 
> series. As you 
> can see, this can get expensive. :)  But the router is cheap!  


Isn't #43 material the *wrong* material to use for
supressing noise on 160 meters? It's described by 
Fair-Rite as appropriate for 20 - 300 MHz for EMI
suppression. Multiple turns may make it more effective
at lower frequencies, but that's just sloppy.

The appropriate materials described in their technical 
article ( http://www.fair-rite.com/CUP%20Paper.pdf )
are #73 or #31. I believe that an Amidon article also
specifies #77 for 1+ MHz chokes, and I've seen #77
also recommended elsewhere.

73,

Jeff Maass  K8ND
 

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>