TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & SignaLink USB

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI & SignaLink USB
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:18:56 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 7/10/2014 6:41 AM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
Tigertronics i.e. SignaLink has transformers on the input and output signals for isolation.

A transformer does NOT provide isolation to differential mode signals. It only blocks common mode signals. For example, audio voltage on both windings of a 1:1 transformer are equal, and no impedance is added to the differential circuit. In a 4:1 transformer, the voltages are proportional to the turns ratio, and the impedance looking into the transformer is equal to terminating Z multiplied by the square of the turns ratio.

Remember that "600 ohms" has not been used in pro audio for at least 40 years. Output stages are low-Z sources, typically 100 ohms for pro products, 300 ohms or more for consumer stuff, and input stages are high impedance, typically 10K for pro products, 50K for consumer products. The impedance of a microphone is defined as 1/5 of it's recommended minimum load impedance, and a low-Z mic's output Z is typically on the order of 100 ohms. All commonly used ham mics are low-Z, wired unbalanced.

As you have described the schematic, with individual 10K in series with both the mic and line inputs, I agree there should be good isolation. Perhaps the schematic is not accurate?

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>