Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline

To:	tentec@contesting.com
Subject:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline
From:	Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Reply-to:	Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Aug 2013 15:46:14 -0500
List-post:	<tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>

I should point out that the ITT "Reference Data" is for DC resistance ofno. 18 copper. But, Could the RF impedance loss be that much greater (8ohms vs. the resistance of only 0.6 ohms per 100 feet?


S. Rohre
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Equipment Sighting, (continued) Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Equipment Sighting, Richards [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Joe KX4JR Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Wade Staggs Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Jim Brown Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Joel Hallas Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline -- Comments on QST report, Steve Hunt Message not available Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre <= Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Richards Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Wade Staggs Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Jim Brown

Previous by Date:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre
Next by Date:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Stuart Rohre
Next by Thread:	Re: [TenTec] Wet ladderline, Steve Hunt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]