To: | barry.n1eu@gmail.com, jhenry@tentec.com, tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] RX366 |
From: | Rsoifer@aol.com |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 18 May 2013 20:42:05 -0400 (EDT) |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Barry, Thanks for doing the test. Sounds like John Henry was right in not classifying the RX366 as general coverage. The only thing I do with the 566 sub rx in the ham bands is pileup spotting (no, I don't have Skimmer). i usually put the DX station on the sub rx and tune with the main rx. I find the original sub rx adequate for this about 90% of the time. I don't have the antenna farm for a real diversity system either. So, for now, I'll stay with the original sub rx. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Barry N1EU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] RX366, John Rippey |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, John Occhipinti |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Richards |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |