TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RX366

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366
From: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: wb5jnc@centurytel.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 21:23:21 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Rick,

I have to agree. Even with just casual operating (I'm not a contester) I've 
seen more than one situation where other stations were complaining 
about "splatter" or QRM (on both SSB and CW) which wasn't noticeable when 
listening with rigs like the Corsairs/Paragon/Omni V etc. While 
a "competition" grade rig isn't needed in my case, I do (to use your term) 
prefer to have something "good enough" for the situation at hand. (Note that 
I've had my hands on some "not good enough" rigs over the years at various 
club events and Field Day and understand exactly what Rob is talking about.)

TNX/73, Al

On Sun May 19 2013 6:13:32 pm Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> John, I endorsed every word of your post until the last sentence.  Then the
> alarms went off.
>
> Rob clearly emphasizes in his presentations that many things contribute to
> making a good receiver and not to only judge a radio by its position on the
> list, but to call it an "extreme rarity" is just as wrong as using the list
> to judge by.
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>