To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RX366 |
From: | Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 19 May 2013 10:06:11 +0000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I don't have the test equipment to do the comparison in the ham bands. To me it's a no-brainer that a down-converting rx with narrow 9MHz roofing filters will significantly outperform an up-converting rx with only 7.5KHz wide filters. Also, my years of listening intensively with the original subrx clearly showed its tendency to create spurious images in the presence of strong signals. My experience with the RX-366 shows that it is essentially equivalent to the Orion main receiver in performance. If you were thinking in terms of sensitivity, there won't be much of a difference between the subreceivers. Why would there be and who cares, when band noise predominates 99% of the time. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] RX366, Rsoifer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] RX366, PA5MW, Mark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |