If the other station doesn't want or expect a "real" signal report then I
say they shouldn't have asked.
Having repaired quite a few Tentec radios and noted or calibrated the S
meter circuit as required, I'm very comfortable with the S meter accuracy.
Otherwise, like in a contest situation, just give everyone a 5x9 report and
add 20 dB.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. Eric Sluder" <resluder@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Cc: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa
I agree Bob, but when giving an honest signal report from your Ten-Tec
rig... The other guy doesn't always seem thrilled to receive your report.
Just sharing my recent experience. It doesn't bother me one bit though...
And I like knowing the real signal strength of what I'm receiving.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 9, 2013, at 12:27 PM, "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
wrote:
Based on the development of the S meter system by Art Collins of Collins
Radio, the S meter should always indicate accurate signal strength. Over
the years I've had several inquire about this and my reasoning is this.
If your change the receiver RF Gain did you actually change the stations
signal strength? The same applies to when the ATTN function is engaged
or when the PRE function is engaged. Therefore the S meter display
should not reflect any change in receiver parameters inflicted by the
operator.
My take ...... Tentec does it correct.....many other companies only give
relative display values of no substantive meaning.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kim Elmore"
<cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa
Oh, I wouldn't be quite that harsh. I am curious, though, about why TT
chose to do it this way.
73,
Kim N5OP
"People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as
the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
On Apr 8, 2013, at 23:16, Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net> wrote:
Ahaaaa! So when the S-meter doesn't reflect the AGC action, what we
have is an undocumented FEATURE. ;-)
73,
Dave Heil K8MN
On 4/8/2013 13 17, Kim Elmore wrote:
I just did a careful by-ear test and Barry is absolutely correct: the
AGC *DOES,* indeed, behave exactly as it should under 3.033xa. As has
been pointed out here and, apparently earlier, the S-meter does *NOT*
follow the AGC action and instead acts as if the AGC were set to
"fast"
in earlier firmware versions.
73,
Kim N%OP
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6232 - Release Date:
04/08/13
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|