TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:55:13 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Oh, I wouldn't be quite that harsh. I am curious, though, about why TT chose to 
do it this way.

73,

Kim N5OP

"People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the 
music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith

On Apr 8, 2013, at 23:16, Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net> wrote:

> Ahaaaa!  So when the S-meter doesn't reflect the AGC action, what we have is 
> an undocumented FEATURE.  ;-)
> 
> 73,
> 
> Dave Heil K8MN
> 
> On 4/8/2013 13 17, Kim Elmore wrote:
>> I just did a careful by-ear test and Barry is absolutely correct: the
>> AGC *DOES,* indeed, behave exactly as it should under 3.033xa. As has
>> been pointed out here and, apparently earlier, the S-meter does *NOT*
>> follow the AGC action and instead acts as if the AGC were set to "fast"
>> in earlier firmware versions.
>> 
>> 73,
>> 
>> Kim N%OP
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6232 - Release Date: 04/08/13
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>