TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa
From: "R. Eric Sluder" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:37:40 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I agree Bob, but when giving an honest signal report from your Ten-Tec rig... 
The other guy doesn't always seem thrilled to receive your report.  Just 
sharing my recent experience.  It doesn't bother me one bit though... And I 
like knowing the real signal strength of what I'm receiving.

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 9, 2013, at 12:27 PM, "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net> wrote:

> Based on the development of the S meter system by Art Collins of Collins 
> Radio, the S meter should always indicate accurate signal strength.  Over the 
> years I've had several inquire about this and my reasoning is this.  If your 
> change the receiver RF Gain did you actually change the stations signal 
> strength?  The same applies to when the ATTN function is engaged or when the 
> PRE function is engaged.  Therefore the S meter display should not reflect 
> any change in receiver parameters inflicted by the operator.
> 
> My take ...... Tentec does it correct.....many other companies only give 
> relative display values of no substantive meaning.
> 
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kim Elmore" <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 7:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] A-Meter Calibration in 3.033xa
> 
> 
>> Oh, I wouldn't be quite that harsh. I am curious, though, about why TT chose 
>> to do it this way.
>> 
>> 73,
>> 
>> Kim N5OP
>> 
>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the 
>> music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>> 
>> On Apr 8, 2013, at 23:16, Dave Heil <k8mn@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ahaaaa!  So when the S-meter doesn't reflect the AGC action, what we have 
>>> is an undocumented FEATURE.  ;-)
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> 
>>> Dave Heil K8MN
>>> 
>>> On 4/8/2013 13 17, Kim Elmore wrote:
>>>> I just did a careful by-ear test and Barry is absolutely correct: the
>>>> AGC *DOES,* indeed, behave exactly as it should under 3.033xa. As has
>>>> been pointed out here and, apparently earlier, the S-meter does *NOT*
>>>> follow the AGC action and instead acts as if the AGC were set to "fast"
>>>> in earlier firmware versions.
>>>> 
>>>> 73,
>>>> 
>>>> Kim N%OP
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6232 - Release Date: 04/08/13
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>