| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals |
|---|---|
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:44:14 -0800 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 1/26/2012 7:44 PM, Richards wrote: > What about a vertical dipole ? If it is in close proximity to the earth, it is unbalanced. Close in this context means as a fraction of a wavelength. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals, Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals, ChasW3KC |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals, Richards |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals, Richards |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |