| To: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:44:59 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
What about a vertical dipole ? ====================== K8JHR ======================= On 1/26/2012 5:08 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > But this antenna is NOT balanced -- the radials have a MUCH MUCH LOWER > impedance to earth than the vertical element. It is a GOOD antenna, but > it is NOT a BALANCED antenna. > _______________________________________________ .. . _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] Grounds and balanced fed verticals, Joel Hallas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals, Jim Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Re. [Ten Tec] --- and balanced fed verticals, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |