To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials. |
From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 07 Jan 2011 21:20:18 +0000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jerry, That's interesting! I wrote them last year about exactly the same error in a QST article. I got a nice response acknowledging the error, but there was no correction ever printed. Similar response on half a dozen other issues, either within QST articles or the Antenna Book; I've now given up trying :) 73, Steve G3TXQ On 06/01/2011 22:46, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote: > HQ can be most stubborn about correcting > technical errors too, try to get them to change. I have been trying to > get them to show the correct formula for low impedance parallel lines > for about 43 years. Hasn't had an effect yet. > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] New and Improved Terminology (NVIS origins), Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole for 80/160m, Kimberly Elmore |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, and radials., Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NEC, ground, grounds, radials (and keying), Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |