TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:54:15 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Right on point, Paul.

Kenwood makes a big deal of the down conversion on its brochure, and did 
so at Dayton, and etc.    It does not make it all that clear the down 
conversion is limited to specific bands.

You get it.  Your post addresses my concern exactly.

===========================  James -K8JHR  =====================


On 9/29/2010 6:33 PM, Paul Christensen wrote:

>
> It's there. Sort of.  See the graph on p. 3 of the TS-590 brochure:

> Note that Kenwood claims 2 kHz DR (500Hz, preamp off) in excess of 107 dB.
> Pretty extraordinary right?   But note that the claim is on 20m where a
> down-conversion scheme to 11 MHz is used.  What about WARC and 10m?  If
> those bands are using up-conversion, then there will likely be a big
> disparity in attainable DR across bands.  The TS-590's down-conversion
> scheme is optimized where contesters need it most.
>
> By contrast, the Eagle's design should result in reasonably uniform DR
> across HF bands, at least through 10m.  Hopefully, Sherwood, QST, and RadCom
> are ready to spend more band-by-band time with their measurements because
> the variation in results is going to be very interesting.

========================================================================
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>