TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:33:11 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
> "I looked all over the Kenwood TX-590 product brochure and cannot find a
> clear specification for dynamic range.   Not that it is the only spec of
> interest, but the Kenwood company says it is a "K-3" killer, with  "best
> of class"  dynamic range..."

It's there. Sort of.  See the graph on p. 3 of the TS-590 brochure:

http://www.kenwoodusa.com/UserFiles/File/UnitedStates/Communications/AMA/Brochures/TS-590.pdf

Note that Kenwood claims 2 kHz DR (500Hz, preamp off) in excess of 107 dB. 
Pretty extraordinary right?   But note that the claim is on 20m where a 
down-conversion scheme to 11 MHz is used.  What about WARC and 10m?  If 
those bands are using up-conversion, then there will likely be a big 
disparity in attainable DR across bands.  The TS-590's down-conversion 
scheme is optimized where contesters need it most.

By contrast, the Eagle's design should result in reasonably uniform DR 
across HF bands, at least through 10m.  Hopefully, Sherwood, QST, and RadCom 
are ready to spend more band-by-band time with their measurements because 
the variation in results is going to be very interesting.

Paul, W9AC



 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>