TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Eagle
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:15:26 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The comparison of the Eagle and the Kenwood TS-590 is intriguing.

I looked all over the Kenwood TX-590 product brochure and cannot find a 
clear specification for dynamic range.   Not that it is the only spec of 
interest, but the Kenwood company says it is a "K-3" killer, with  "best 
of class"  dynamic range,... but I have yet to find where Kenwood 
specifies the dynamic range.

Even Yaesu gives a figure of 112 dB/IP3 +40dBm   for its FT-DX 5000. 
But the Kenwood guys only claim "best in class" - whatever that means.

What does this tell us?  Or does Kenwood specify it someplace I have yet 
to discover?

Given the Eagle specs, it is pretty good compared to the FT-DX-5000
which costs way more money and is a HUGE black box with numerous knobs, 
buttons, and switches.  Given the lack of details from Kenwood, I 
suspect its new rig cannot really compete or it would be bragging abut 
its pedigree with greater specificity.

Any traction?

============================ K8JHR  ============================





On 9/28/2010 4:42 PM, WILLIE BABER wrote:
> Since the Eagle is priced at 400 dollar less than K3, it should sell quite 
> well for anyone paying attention to receiver design and cost.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>