TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Class A

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
From: "RM" <royalct@inr.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 10:27:49 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Most of those folks certainly do produce a lot of 'growling' bassy
audio......  Great Audio???????????????????

Ron, NU1U 

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Gary Hoffman
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 19:31
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A

Perhaps, perhaps....but how does this relate to Ten-Tec radio equipment ?

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message -----
From: "yahoo email" <barbiekenw@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:36 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Class A


> I think the folks who engage in all the modified audio and broadcast
quality activity are folks who do not have a good healthy
> activity outlet -- like CW, or a test bench.   Have you ever met someone
who was into ESSB etc who was a CW operator?
> With the new "no C W" extra class operators, there will likely be more of
this misguided activity.
> Ken K5WK
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>