TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Class A

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
From: w8au@sssnet.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 17:57:05 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
At 02:11 PM 1/6/07, Grant Youngman wrote:
> activity outlet -- like CW, or a test bench.   Have you ever
> met someone who was into ESSB etc who was a CW operator?
> With the new "no C W" extra class operators, there will
> likely be more of this misguided activity.

I do fail to see what makes the activity "misguided".  Or how not
having a CW exam is going to make a wit of difference.

Maybe not "misguided," but with new HF operators coming aboard with no CW knowledge, the "investigation" of modes is thus reduced. No way to go except to try to make FONE more interesting since who can stand to listen to typical SSB for hours on end? (Gag, choke!):-(

Perry w8au

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>