TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Class A

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:11:14 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
> activity outlet -- like CW, or a test bench.   Have you ever 
> met someone who was into ESSB etc who was a CW operator?
> With the new "no C W" extra class operators, there will 
> likely be more of this misguided activity.

Not interested in starting a thread laoded with the usual flames on this
subject, because I seem to recall it has come up several times before ...  

But, I do fail to see what makes the activity "misguided".  Or how not
having a CW exam is going to make a wit of difference.

Grant/NQ5T



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>