TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report
From: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:17:43 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Mario,

I would add to the list of DSP's benefits "finally enough filters".
In the past, no rig had enough slots to put all the crystal filters I
wanted.
Now with DSP, the rigs have enough filters.

73
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Marijan Miletic, S56A
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 2:14 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report


W4ZV> With IF's above 30 MHz, we got General Coverage receivers at the
expense of very poor close-spaced IMD and BDR performance.

The unique DSP contribution to HF RX is smart auto-notch and noise
reduction, the rest is marketing!

IF above 15 MHz removes superhet images from HF working range!  Collins IF
goes even above 3 x 30 MHz.  W0IYH in QEX nicely explains cost/performance
trade-offs with narrow front-end crystal filters.  I am surprised that
purists are not buying more 200 $ crystal filters at the antenna input!?

73 de Maro, S56A, N1YU

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>