To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:58:49 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Mario, >The only progress since is in DDS, optional DSP and IF above 2 x 30 MHz. Some would argue there has been little true progress in the areas you mentioned. With DDS we got generally worse phase noise performance than we had using crystal oscillators. With DSP we got a lot of marketing hype but very little actual performance improvement IMHO. With IF's above 30 MHz, we got General Coverage receivers at the expense of very poor close-spaced IMD and BDR performance. As Rob Sherwood has observed, it's interesting that even Orion's narrow roofing filter is really an old idea "rediscovered" after many years. With the sole exception of Orion, the 30 year old R4C using a Sherwood roofing filter beats every single modern radio introduced in the past 10 years: http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/Dynamic_Range_Data.pdf and... http://www.w8ji.com/receiver%20IM3%20sorted.htm You may call this "progress" but I'm afraid I don't...especially when you consider what the IC-7800 and FT DX 9000 cost. Unfortunately many are assuming "new technology = better performance", but they really should study the actual test results and performance comparisons more carefully. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Orion and it's auto tuner, K Van Horn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] 7800 reviews, John L Merrill |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] IC-7800 Expanded Test Report, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |