Steve,
My software runs in the PC and talks to the Orion just like the pegasus
program does. And my program has a sweep that runs on the sub-receiver. It
is not as fast as the Orion sweep but it is nice to be able to click on a
signal with the mouse and instantly go there.
Carl Moreschi N4PY
Franklinton, NC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@igLou.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 2:46 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] band stacking
> Carl. Your server finally came up and I read the info. I couldn't
understand
> if your program is something that runs strictly on the PC or if it
actually
> replaces the firmware in the rig. I'm waiting on TenTec to release the new
> one but so far, no show.
> I took you advice about turning off the sweep and just had 2 hours of
solids
> QSO time without a reset. That sweep must eat up a lot of processor and
> eventually lock up the rig. Wonder if the new firmware will fix that?
> Steve
> N4LQ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 6:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] band stacking
>
>
> > My N4PY Orion Control Program solves this band stacking problem. It has
> > separate band buttons for CW and SSB and a third set that can be defined
> for
> > SWL or PSK use.
> >
> > See my webapge at www.n4py.com
> >
> > Carl Moreschi N4PY
> > Franklinton, NC
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Ewing" <martin@aa6e.net>
> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Cc: <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 6:04 PM
> > Subject: [TenTec] band stacking (was cooling the Orion)
> >
> >
> > > I find the band stacking registers frustrating. Why? For my taste:
> > >
> > > 1. There should be an on-screen indication of which BS reg you have
> > > selected.
> > > 2. It should be possible to set and lock the info in the BS regs.
> > >
> > > For each band, I would like to be able to switch between a typical CW
> > > setting (freq, mode & filters), a typical PSK setting, and a typical
SSB
> > > setting, etc. (Actually, I would like the AGC settings, freq step
> > > settings, etc, to be included in the mode setup / BS regs.)
> > >
> > > This can kinda be done now, but without locking & displaying the
> > > register setting, my setups get mixed up pretty quickly.
> > >
> > > Switching between my normal CW, PSK, and SSB settings now is
> > > frustrating, because there is too much button-pushing and thinking
> > required.
> > >
> > > I bet this is not a big change to the firmware, if TT chooses to
> > implement.
> > >
> > > 73, Martin AA6E
> > >
> > > W4BQF penned:
> > >
> > > >Maybe this will help some (I hope!):
> > > >
> > > >Push the '80' mtr button,
> > > >Enter a freq, such as 3.505; set the mode, set the DSP filter,
> > > >Push the '80' mtr button again,
> > > >Ender a freq, such as 3.530, set the mode, set the DSP filter,
> > > >Push the '80' mtr button again,
> > > >Enter a freq, such as 3.875, set the mode, set the DSP filter,
> > > >Push the '80' mtr button again,
> > > >Enter a freq, such as 3.923, set the mode, set the DSP filter,
> > > >Push the '80' mtr button again, but this time the freq, mode and DSP
> > filter
> > > >settings will recall the 3.505 information you previously stored. Now
> > each
> > > >time you push the '80' mtr button it will recall each of the freq, it
> > turn,
> > > >that you had set.
> > > >
> > > >However, lets say you had recalled the 3.530 freq information and you
> > > >randomly tune around and stop on, say 3.545, and then decide to go to
> 20
> > > >mtrs, when you finish on 20m and go back to 80mtrs, the rig will
return
> > to
> > > >the frequency it was at when you QSY'ed to 20 mtrs. In other words,
> the
> > > >band stacking memories are active and will not keep the four
> > > >freq/mode/filter settings permanently. When you leave a band and then
> > come
> > > >back to it, the settings that you had when you left that original
band
> is
> > > >what has been stored in the top band stack memory.
> > > >
> > > >It's more complicated to write about than to actually use it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|