Re: [TenTec] BPL Update

[edoc <kd4e@arrl.net>]

Tommy wrote:
> You are technically correct. What was actually said was "The administration
> is highly in favor of BLP." Interpt it any way you wish.
> Tom - W4BQF

In this election season where everything seems to be presented or
interpreted as having partisan purpose we seem to find ourselves
parsing every word.  An after-effect, I suppose, of the Clinton-Gore 
years when all of we non-lawyers learned about new word games like
"It depends what your definition of is is." and "There is no
controlling legal authority."  Sigh.

So that we might address our E-mails, letters, and phone calls to
the correct individuals can you specify precisely whom it is in
this administration you know with certainty to be "highly in favor
of BPL", please?

This administration, like all before it, includes thousands of people 
with many differing opinions, knowledge levels, and perspectives --
one will find some in favor, some opposed, and most undecided.  Were
we to change administrations to another political party the same
diversity of opinion would remain, the names would just change.

Generalizations work against us in this campaign to inform the
uninformed and to derail this RFI trainwreck, only specifics are of value.

IMHO, YMMV ...

--
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
West Central Florida
Op. Atlas, Drake, Hallicrafters, TenTec ...
p.s. Linux-incompatible hardware is defective!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec