TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] BPL Update

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] BPL Update
From: "Tom Sessions" <k4rv@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: k4rv@mindspring.com, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:31:44 -00
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks, Carl.  I wasn't aware of that.

73
Tom K4RV


> [Original Message]
> From: Carl Moreschi <n4py@earthlink.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: 3/26/2004 01:04:15
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] BPL Update
>
> I know this is not the point you were trying to make but those unused UHF
> channels are now being used for local HDTV transmission.  Each local
channel
> now has several UHF channels assigned to it for HDTV.  Each local channel
> here in the Raleigh, NC area has 3 to 5 assignments of UHF channels for
> HDTV.  There is actually very little unused spectrum available now in the
> UHF channel range.
>
>
> Carl Moreschi N4PY
> Franklinton, NC
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Sessions" <k4rv@mindspring.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 12:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] BPL Update
>
>
> >
> > The solution to the BPL problem is SO simple.  Now that it has been
proven
> > by spending millions of $$$ on lobbying that BPL open wire transmission
> > lines will not generate measurable RF radiation from their virtual point
> > charges, let's just move the BPL spectrum away from HF and up to all
those
> > unused UHF TV channels. Then those ignorant hams who know nothing useful
> > about real world electromagnetics would finally be silenced.
> >
> > We all now know that if a big company can prove it theoretically- then
it
> > MUST be true - especially at the FCC.  So why bother with any
> measurements?
> > Our regulatory authority should score a big one in the worlds of physics
> > and engineering by finally discovering an electrical technique that
needs
> > no testing because it can be completely verified through hear-say and
> > investor relation$.  WOW!
> >
> > Since no one has ever "officially" complained of BPL interference in the
> > USA ....... (the laws of physics obviously must prohibit atmospheric
> > propagation of BPL electromagnetic waves between the northern border of
> > mexico and the southern border of Canada).... why even notch for local
UHF
> > stations!!!!!   And if by some quirk of nature BPL interference did
> disrupt
> > a viewer's TV, he could just simply turn his bow tie antenna to another
> > direction.
> >
> >
> > Tom Sessions, ignorant ham
> > k4rv@mindspring.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>