[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate

Subject:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate
From:	k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
Date:	Wed Jan 21 11:48:36 2004

Gary McConville wrote:
> They didn't say it was unanimous.  Is there any way to
> determined individual votes?
---------------

Yep, but it will be in the June BOD minutes, which usually come out
around August.

73
Ed

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Dave-KB4ET [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Gary McConville [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Sherman Banks [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Lee Hiers [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Gary McConville [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB <= [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Daniel Jeswald [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Daniel Jeswald [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Lee Hiers [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Robin Gist [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Lee Hiers [SECC] NAQP SSB, Kevan Nason

Previous by Date:	[SECC] NCJ Sprint CW, John Laney
Next by Date:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB
Previous by Thread:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, Gary McConville
Next by Thread:	[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate, K4SB
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]