SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate

Subject: [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate
From: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville)
Date: Wed Jan 21 11:19:09 2004
They didn't say it was unanimous.  Is there any way to
determined individual votes?

Gary - WB4SQ

--- Lee Hiers <aa4ga@contesting.com> wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2004 at 20:04, Sherman Banks wrote:
> 
> > Your best bet is to vote for representatives that
> think like you do.  They
> > only propose these things because they believe
> they can get re-elected with
> > these policies.
> 
> For at least the past two terms, the SE Division
> Director 
> has been unopposed.
> 
> 73 de Lee
> 
> -- 
> Lee Hiers, AA4GA
> Cornelia, Georgia
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>