SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate

Subject: [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate
From: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:10:11 2004
I already asked Mr. Hainey that question.  He said he didn't know of any
way.  BUt to hold on and see what happens.  Bullcrap.  

This is what nearly destroyed ham radio back in the sixties with incentive
licensing.  The ARRL doing what they dang well wanted to do without
consulting the hard core membership.  And I'm not talking of the 'new'
crowd that thinks ham radio is just super CB.

Dan/W4NTI


> [Original Message]
> From: Gary McConville <wb4sq@yahoo.com>
> To: <secc@contesting.com>
> Date: 1/19/04 10:03:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [SECC] The ARRL's answer to the code/no-code debate
>
> How do you get your money back from the ARRL if you're
> a lifetime member?
>
> WB4SQ
>
> --- K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Well, about as expected.
> > 
> > Just when are we going to throw this board out for
> > good?
> > 
> > (:<
> > Ed
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>