SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Re:C&bls

Subject: [SECC] Re:C&bls
From: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
Date: Thu Dec 11 23:40:35 2003
John Vickers wrote:
> WA4TT votes yes.................. and agrees with W4OC that all votes should
> be by the SECC mail reflector. This would include all interested parties and
> keep it simple and easy---- just like the SECC was intended to be from the
> beginning.
---------------
Just a note. Any member should be allowed to vote in secrecy if
he/she/it wants.

73
Ed
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>