SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Re:C&bls

Subject: [SECC] Re:C&bls
From: wa4tt at nlamerica.com (John Vickers)
Date: Thu Dec 11 17:53:22 2003
WA4TT votes yes.................. and agrees with W4OC that all votes should
be by the SECC mail reflector. This would include all interested parties and
keep it simple and easy---- just like the SECC was intended to be from the
beginning.

> Behalf Of K4SB
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:28 PM
> To: secc
> Subject: [SECC] Re:C&bls
>
>
> The following text is an exact copy of the Constitution and By Laws
> from the SECC web page.
>
> MEETINGS: Article IV
> The By-Laws shall provide for regular and special meetings, a minimum
> of one-fourth of the membership shall constitute a quorum for the
> transaction of business.
> --------------------------
> I propose amending this Article to read as follows:
>
> The By-Laws shall provide for regular and special meetings. A simple
> majority of those members in attendance, including any member who
> submits a proxy vote by any means shall constitute a quorum for the
> transaction of business.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> By Laws
>
> 5. Contest Participation: In order to remain as members in good
> standing, members must attend at least two meetings per calendar year
> and must contribute to at least two club scores in ARRL, CQ Magazine
> or National Contest Journal sponsored contests. Members may ask for
> this requirement to be waived due to various circumstances. Club
> members shall vote to continue membership status in such cases.
> ----------------------------------
> I propose amending paragraph 5 as follows:
>
> 5. Contest Participation: In order to remain as members in good
> standing, members must  contribute to at least two club scores in
> ARRL, CQ Magazine or National Contest Journal sponsored contests per
> calendar year. If such requirements are not met, any Club member may
> request a vote to continue membership status in such cases.
> ----------------------
>
> Since the requirements in Article IV have not been met for the
> election of officers, I move that these amendments, if adopted, be
> made retroactive to 1 January 2003 in order to retain all officers of
> the club at present. A simple majority of members who submit votes by
> any means shall determine the passage or rejection of these proposals.
>
> Please reply to our unofficial VP, K4BAI, or to the SECC reflector
> with your vote.
> ----------------------------
> to K4BAI: K4SB votes Yes
> --------------------------
>
> 73 and this will be the last of it.
>
> Ed
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>