[SECC] ARRL 160 M

[k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight)]

AB4RU@aol.com wrote:
It was determined the the decision really didn't count because it should
have been placed in a "locked box".
> 
> Ron

I propose a vote to put Ron in a "locked box" until the next contest,
when he will undoubtably beat the living hell out of us.

73
Ed

--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com