RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes

To: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>, "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes
From: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:18:28 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Michael, the US stations can't connect to anything, US or not, that is wider than 500Hz outside the auto sub bands. I've seen US stations connect to Canadian nodes, P3 and W1600 out of US allocations, no one is watching or cares except the guy that gets stepped on.
It's mostly the out of control Winmor stations that usually.eat my lunch.

Since you have the frequency list available take a look at WG3G, how is that even close to
being legal?  I'm not asking for a defense, just pointing out a problem.


Ron K0IDT


On 8/18/2016 11:20 AM, Michael Adams wrote:
Well, I just did something I haven't done in a long time.

I opened a Winlink client and updated the Pactor frequency lists.

For whatever it's worth, I see:

VE7RBH, a P4 node, at 14081.5
IQ9IL, a P4 node, at 14082.5

They're legal today (assuming a K-land station wasn't using P4), as the 
automated subband restriction is an FCC-ism, and there's nothing in Part 97 to 
prohibit US amateurs from calling the DX nodes.

I might tweak my comments to the FCC.  (I suppose that's why the professionals 
take their time in submitting comments!)  My mid-term scenario might need 
revision.

If US-access to P4 leads to increased utilization of the DX nodes... it's 
probably not enough to convince the FCC to not drop the symbol rate limit, but 
it might make for a stronger argument for a bandwidth limit below the ACDS 
frequencies due to interference.


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>