RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster Pro RTTY Question

To: Phil <wa2lxe@optonline.net>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster Pro RTTY Question
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:35:29 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

My gut tells me that the RB should activate PTT thru ACC-1, but RB
Technical Support says it's only used for received audio. They say I
must use Mic or CI-V. I'm using the RB in the same way as before: Rig
Control on connector B and FSK on connector A. Therefore I have not
changed any internal RB jumpers. I'm really confused.

If you have never connected the Mic and RB does not support PTT on the
ACC connector, you *must* have been using CI-V commands for PTT.  In
that case, something has changed in your software configuration and
it is no longer sending the necessary PTT commands.

With no PTT connection to either the mic or the ACC jack, the PTT LED
on RB+ is meaningless.  If it were my station, I would throw away the
RB ACC cable and replace it with one that has audio in, audio out,
FSK *and* PTT.

>> Also changed PC and software from Writelog to N1MM.

It is likely that you have not configured N1MM+ for PTT by software
command - try checking the appropriate "PTT Control via Software
Command" boxes in the CAT set-up (Config -> Configure Ports ... then
"Set" for the Radio port).  WriteLog's "Comm PTT" defaults to ON for
Icom rigs which does PTT by software command.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 6/6/2016 1:08 AM, Phil wrote:
Joe and Rich,
Thanks for your comments.
I use a WMR cable form the RB to the ACC-1 connector on the Icom.  This is
the same cable I used with the old PC and true serial cables for years.
I never used the Mic connector.
My gut tells me that the RB should activate PTT thru ACC-1, but RB Technical
Support says it's only used for received audio.  They say I must use Mic or
CI-V.  I'm using the RB in the same way as before: Rig Control on connector
B and FSK on connector A.  Therefore I have not changed any internal RB
jumpers. I'm really confused.
Phil



-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe Subich,
W4TV
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 3:23 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Rigblaster Pro RTTY Question


 > RB is connected to IC-7700 Aux port and CI-V.

What signals are connected from the RigBlaster Pro to the IC-7700 ACC jack?
Do you have *both* FSK (pin 1) and PTT (pin 3) connected to the ACC jack
(ground/common pin pin 2)?

 > Does anyone know the path of the PTT signal from the RB to the 7700?

Unless you connect PTT output from your interface to the HSEND line on
ACC[1] or the PTT line on the mic jack, your interface can not assert PTT on
the IC-7700 (an Icom transceiver).

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 6/5/2016 1:01 PM, Phil wrote:
I am using N1MM to connect to a Rigblaster Pro via two WMR USB/serial
cables,

When trying to send an FSK RTTY message the following occurs:

Hear a relay "click" from the RB.

RB Green CS LED comes on.

RB Red PTT comes on.

RB Red FSK comes on and blinks to follow RTTY data.

RIG IS NOT PUT IN TRANSMIT MODE.

If I manually activate rig, RTTY signal is transmitted.



RB is connected to IC-7700 Aux port and CI-V.

No Mic connection.

Does anyone know the path of the PTT signal from the RB to the 7700?



As info, Rig Control works fine on RB connector B and all worked fine
before change from true serial cables to USB/serial cables.  Also
changed PC and software from Writelog to N1MM.

Thanks.

Phil

WA2LXE

wa2lxe@optonline.net <mailto:wa2lxe@optonline.net>





_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>