RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results

To: "Simone Wilson" <m0box@btinternet.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:35:11 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
What if my computer clock is off by 5 minuets because it has not been on for 8 months?

Or if I'm using a mechanical RTTY machine and am looking at the clock and sending everything manually?

What does it matter as long as the "time" (which is a no more than a serial number really) is the same for the contact?

More thought needed here...

73
Jim W7RY


-----Original Message----- From: Simone Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 3:30 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG HF Contest 2015 Preliminary Results

CQ,

I have noted a significant problem, highlighted by a few respondents, where the exchange element of the QSO time is out by one or more minutes. This can happen as the clock ticks over the minute mid QSO and under difficult condition, even two minutes. Whilst the original time is transmitted the number finally logged is the current clock time due to the wrong time macro being used in the exchange setup. I have therefore decided to allow a tolerance of two minutes on the exchange time to cope with this very common fault.

The test has been re-uploaded and is again available at the URL below.



73 de Simone. M0BOX

BARTG Contest Manageress







http://tinyurl.com/opezrbn

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>