To: | RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters |
From: | Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:07:00 -0700 |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
I gently suggest that eighty and forty RTTY have growth potential. One-sixty RTTY is a niche population with not a lot of growth potential. Until eighty and forty are booming with diddles, don't waste proselytizing effort on one-sixty--go for the money bands. Diddle Exuberantly, Hank, W6SX _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] FM Southgate AR > HamRadioNow: ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition, RM-11708, iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters, Bill Turner |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters, Bill Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |