RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and

To: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts and status
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:53:53 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

Undocumented codes are prohibited below 50 MHz.


73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/17/2014 7:42 PM, Terry wrote:
And ID in CW, especially if they use a undocumented code.



-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe Subich,
W4TV
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 5:44 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Digital Operators Band Plan Committee - Current thoughts
and status


But even in the so called "automatic control" subbands *every* amateur
station is required to listen before they transmit.  Perhaps RM-11708 should
include a requirement that *any* digital station include a "channel busy"
detector that can not be defeated by the operator.

73,

     ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/17/2014 5:37 PM, John Becker wrote:
Auto sub band was created to reduce QRM from the PACTOR ect mode so
called robots.
The only problem was that others would wonder and then complain when
QRM'ed.
To bad that all "will" not use that suggestion.

Not a mailbox station but a user of pactor and other ARQ modes.

John, W0JAB

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>