It's known as divide and conquer.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/26/2014 2:24 PM, Jay WS7I wrote:
That is a bunch of malarkey, they just don't want the phone operators in
opposition.
On 2/26/2014 9:47 AM, Don AA5AU wrote:
I don't understand this one:
* Shouldn’t 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth data emissions be restricted
to the band segments where phone and image communications are permitted?-
While some commenters have argued for that, it is far beyond the scope
of the ARRL petition. It would require a complete reordering of the
regulatory scheme for the HF bands which would be controversial, to
say the least.
I don't understand the part about having to completely reorder the
regulatory scheme. That sounds like a bunch of malarkey.
And are they trying to say the current proposal is not already
controversial enough?
Don AA5AU
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|