That is a bunch of malarkey, they just don't want the phone operators in
opposition.
On 2/26/2014 9:47 AM, Don AA5AU wrote:
I don't understand this one:
* Shouldn’t 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth data emissions be restricted to the
band segments where phone and image communications are permitted?-
While some commenters have argued for that, it is far beyond the scope of the
ARRL petition. It would require a complete reordering of the regulatory scheme
for the HF bands which would be controversial, to say the least.
I don't understand the part about having to completely reorder the regulatory
scheme. That sounds like a bunch of malarkey.
And are they trying to say the current proposal is not already controversial
enough?
Don AA5AU
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|