"Instead, the League said, its Petition is intended to impose “a limitation on
the maximum bandwidth of data emissions where none exists now.”
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Aubrey W70LY
On Jan 7, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Don Hill AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I particularly like this comment:
>
> "The ARRL further asserted that the fear of interference from automatically
> controlled stations "is not a valid one."
>
> Yeah, right!
>
> Don AA5AU
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ben Antanaitis -
> WB2RHM
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 3:14 PM
> To: rtty-contesting.com
> Subject: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708
>
> All,
>
> I'm appalled that we are misguided fools.... we have mistaken benevolence for
> threat........
>
> The Empire has issue the definitive rebuttal to all our
> foolishness:
> http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-reply-comments-cite-fundamental-misunderstanding-of-symbol-rate-petition
>
> in :
>
> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017582527
>
> 73, HNY,
>
> Ben - WB2RHM
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|