RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:30:08 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

On 1/7/2014 7:01 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
Actually K1ZZ did operate RTTY Roundup and was quite active. I
worked him on 15 and 20 meters and even found him running a
frequency or two.

In which case I find it even more unbelievable that ARRL's Reply to
Comments can claim there is no present or future interference problem
between automatically operated wide bandwidth stations and traditional
narrow bandwidth modes.

Either the ARRL Executive Committee are incompetent or they are liars
(perhaps both).

I know they don't have the balls to present a coherent proposal to
abolish all separation between wideband and narrow band modes, they
intend to attack the "problem" one emission at a time.

Like a child who's parent has told them "no", they are going to keep
asking the Commission for more and more wideband access to the "low
end" of the bands until it is wideband everywhere all the time or the
Commission slaps them down.  In either case the average amateur
loses.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 1/7/2014 7:01 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
Actually K1ZZ did operate RTTY Roundup and was quite active. I worked him on 15 
and 20 meters and even found him running a frequency
or two.

Both times I worked him, he called me and it took everything in my power NOT to send 
something like "RM-11708 sucks".

Don AA5AU

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe Subich, W4TV
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 4:37 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708


Obviously K1ZZ wasn't operating in RTTY RU!

Talk about high handed dictatorial nonsense.   At least I delayed my
Reply Comment long enough to see and respond to this nonsense.  We'll see if 
ARRL tries to revoke my Life Membership after I called
them a bunch of gutless liars who would sell their souls for a bowl of gruel 
but not in those words.

73,

     ... Joe, W4TV


On 1/7/2014 4:48 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
I particularly like this comment:

"The ARRL further asserted that the fear of interference from automatically controlled 
stations "is not a valid one."

Yeah, right!

Don AA5AU

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ben
Antanaitis - WB2RHM
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 3:14 PM
To: rtty-contesting.com
Subject: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708

All,

I'm appalled that we are misguided fools.... we have mistaken benevolence for 
threat........

The Empire has issue the definitive rebuttal to all our
foolishness:
http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-reply-comments-cite-fundamental-misunder
standing-of-symbol-rate-petition

in :

http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017582527

73, HNY,

Ben - WB2RHM

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>