That wasn't even a watering hole....that was out in the desert! ;)
Stan, K4SBZ
"Real radio bounces off the sky."
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 6:27 PM, "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki.ham@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> According to the JT65 website, the operating frequency is 14.076. When I
> was being given an on air reprimand for interfering, I was above 14.100.
> So there is no way in heck I was causing any interference that far down.
> So what does the guy do? He sends me an email with his call sign to
> remind me of my interference. What he doesn't realize is my system is
> recording the entire receive window to a text file. So now we have a
> printed document with him causing interference and not identifying his
> station. I have subsequently sent him a reply email to enlighten him. So
> if any of you per chance happen to get those on air reprimands from an
> unidentified station, here is one call sign that *could* be suspect. KD0RII
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony (N2KI)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> "Is there a good digital band plan?" A band plan is a "Gentlemen's
>> Agreement" because no one owns a frequency. Therefore when a gentleman
>> knows that a frequency is the watering hole for JT65, the gentleman goes
>> somewhere else to drink, to paraphrase the DX Code of Conduct.
>>
>> BTW, do we really want someone to impose a band plan on us? Or do we want
>> to be good amateur radio citizens and voluntarily follow a traditional one
>> without griping at one another? Observe the wild animals of the jungle.
>> They continue to survive because they each stay out of the other's watering
>> holes.
>>
>> Stan, K4SBZ
>>
>> "Real radio bounces off the sky."
>>
>>>> On Jan 6, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> modes. Thankfully, everyone continues to respect the PSK31 folks, but
>> the JT65 people, with their one frequency, are now the enemy? Whatever
>> happened to the DX Code of Conduct? Or is getting that last few points more
>> important than "Respecting my fellow hams and conducting myself
>>>
>>> I "respect" the PSK31 folks because I can see their traces and hear
>>> them if I listen closely (wasn't always the case for me! Not RFI
>>> after all!). Likewise for that calliope mode (MFSK?). That actually
>>> looks kind of cool on the waterfall and if I ever get my RF-on-audio
>>> issues fixed with my DigiKeyer, I should probably try it.
>>>
>>> It's impossible, in many cases, to do the same with Joe Taylor's stuff
>>> (something else I want to try!). I wouldn't know where they hang out
>>> ... and if I was at that spot, didn't hear anything, and sent QRL?
>>> several times with no reply, I would not be violating any codes that I
>>> know of.
>>>
>>> Speaking of "whatever happened to ..." ... is there a good digital
>>> band-plan? I tend not to use the one from the ARRL as it is often
>>> out-of-date and/or optimistic. ;-)
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|