RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users

To: k.siwiak@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:02:31 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Nov 23, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Kai wrote:

> Again, to keep what we can do today, (up to the 300 baud RTTY with up to
> 1000 Hz shift) would require a bandwidth of
>      300+1.2(1000) = 1500 Hz. THAT is the current RTTY teleprinter mode limit

That is actually a darn good suggestion, and does not deviate from what we can 
do today on FSK with the current regulations.

I.e., the narrowest 2 tone FSK bandwidth you can get by using the maximum 
symbol rate and FSK shift that is allowed from the existing regulations.

This would include 850 Hz RTTY shift too, which will allow good experimentation 
to further study selective fading.

Mind if I plagiarize that to include in my own comments to the FCC?

P.S.  It would also de-legalize Pactor III and create a different religious 
war.  (Pactor III is 2K20J2D emission.)

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>