RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal

To: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal
From: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:47:15 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:

> with Winlink, search 'Winlink wants your frequencies" for the last
> time this came around under 'band segmentation by bandwidth'.
> Unless PIII unleashed all over the cw/digital band segments is your
> idea of a good thing it needs to be killed in it's present form. My

OK, help me (us) out here.  The League will say "no, that's not what
this is about" whether it is or not, so what could they point to to
make what they say true?

I share your concern about turning all HF digital bands over to
SailMail, but we need to be ready with counter-arguments as well.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>