RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG)

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG)
From: "Andreas Rehberg" <arehberg@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:22:08 +0100
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Well said David, there actually is no problem.

There's quite a number of contests with 'interesting'
rules, but just a few who complain (do you call that naysayer?) 
abt almost anything and the majority who either follow the 
rules or don't participate.

Perhaps the mod should close this topic as it
can't be solved here.

Andy, DF4WC

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:41:07 -0500
> Von: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
> An: pcooper <pcooper@guernsey.net>
> CC: rtty@contesting.com
> Betreff: Re: [RTTY] US call signs (BARTG)

> Reading all the posts in this particular discussion leaves me a bit
> confused. If we step back and ask what is the problem, what would the
> contest manager say? Is there an unfair advantage or disadvantage to any
> operator in the contest based on whatever this problem appears to be?
> 
> I'm not sure that the answer, at least to the 2nd part, will be yes.
> 
> Personally I operate from my home 99% of the time and it matches the call
> area in my callsign. When I operate elsewhere (contest or casually)  such
> as K2DSL/4 it is easy and doesn't cause me any stress. I'm also fine as
> any
> operator in a contest should be, in following whatever rules that
> particular contest decides. I can't see anyone disagreeing with following
> the documented rules and it is up to the contest manager to enforce those
> rules as best they can.
> 
> So what's the problem we need to solve here?
> 
> David - K2DSL
> 
> On Jan 9, 2013 5:50 AM, "pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Well, thanks for all the responses!
> > Yes, I do appreciate that the comparison between G, GU etc and W is not
> a
> good one, but it was the only way I could think of explaining it.
> >
> > Now, several folk kindly emailed me direct to say things like - Yes, but
> G.GU etc are different DXCC's, with which I agree.
> > By the same token, KL7/KH6/KP2 are ALSO different DXCC's, but you still
> find some in RTTY contests operating from the "lower 48".
> > I even got a KH8 in one contest that was on mainland America.
> >
> > I don't know the answer to this, but does the FCC require that you sign
> differently if you are operating away from your home address?
> > In the UK, if we are operating somewhere other than our designated home
> address, we must sign /P for any temporary address, or /A from an
> "alternative" address, where the alternative is somewhere designated on
> our
> licence.
> >
> > Let's say that you are W6XXX operating from Florida, and you enter the
> BARTG contest as W6XXX only.
> > If your log was to be classed as a check-log only, because you weren't
> following the rules, would you be annoyed?
> > Maybe contests that use US call areas as mults ought to enforce this
> part
> of the rule?
> > Apart from the BARTG contest, there is the EA RTTY contest, DL-DX, DRCG
> LDC, SARTG, JARTS, and WAEDC all use US (and some also include VE/JA/VK)
> call areas as mults, so please don't just single out BARTG for criticism.
> >
> > Thanks again for all the comments.
> >
> > 73 de Phil GU0SUP
> > (definitely in GU!)
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>