RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Now trashy signals

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Now trashy signals
From: "Kenny Young" <ab4gg@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:54:37 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I would want to see what my signal looked like to make sure that it is
clean.  I also agree with pointing out the calls with good signals so that
we could get a little help if needed.

Kenny, ab4gg

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
aflowers@frontiernet.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 9:41 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Now trashy signals

 
For those who haven't seen what Dave is talking about,  I've isolated the
spectra of several RTTY signals from this past weekend that are numbered for
comparison here:
 
http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/rtty_examples/
 
Everyone who is concerned about keeping their signal clean should probably
at least take a look.  You can read the details about how I captured them on
the page, but I think the main point is that there are several operators who
have figured out how to make exceptionally neighbor-friendly signals on a
very crowded band.  Some of the cleaner signals on the link above are really
do stick out from the pack.  It might be worth identifying who owns the
exceptionally good signals and asking them what they are doing right, rather
than pointing fingers at people doing things wrong.  I bet we'll really
learn something.
 
Andy K0SM/2
 
Dave Hachadorian, K6LL wrote:
>I was running a 24" Panadapter on each radio throughout the Roundup.  
>It was very obvious which signals were clean, and which were 
>excessively wide.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>