Point taken - I guess the FCC is the "member society" of an NGO, i.e. the IARU.
I'd still like to know the rationale for not being harmonized with the rest of
region 2. Or, to put my cynical freak on, who benefits from the US being
different?
Al
AB2ZY
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave AA6YQ [mailto:aa6yq@ambersoft.com]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 7:55 PM
To: Al Kozakiewicz; ws7i@ewarg.org; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [RTTY] 18.110
>>>AA6YQ comments below
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Al Kozakiewicz
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 7:35 PM
To: ws7i@ewarg.org; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 18.110
Beyond keeping your emission products between 18.068 and 18.168, I'm not sure
the FCC cares. RTTY at 18.112, or 18.150 for that matter, is still within the
17m band. It just doesn't adhere to the ARRL's (I assume they are the "member
society" in IARU lingo) implementation of the region 2 IARU band plan.
>>>The 18.110 megahertz upper limit on RTTY transmission is stipulated
>>>in
§97.305 of the FCC rules:
http://www.ncvec.org/page.php?id=137
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|