Interesting I have tried all sorts of reports over the years and this year
operated at K7OX's for Roundup. He had his set up W7WHY 599 WA WA
I don't recall more than a couple of times during the entire time that I
operated that any one asked for a repeat. I really don't like that report
nor do I like W7WHY 599 WA WA W7WHY as then someone tuning bye has no idea
who's frequency it is but again that also didn't seem to pose a problem.
I used to send W7WHY 599 WA WA W7WHY DE WS7I but that is far out of vogue.
Not at all sure with one radio that the length of the exchange makes much
difference, but I do agree that you should send the recepient's call with
the exchange.
So I sorta agree with K7OX's method and if you can't copy your call ask for
a repeat and you will get it.
Sort of like when you ask for repeat of serial number of State/Province.
Don't send the entire buffer again program up one that has 001 001 001 001
or WA WA WA WA most of this is always up to the operator but I agree when in
doubt ask for a repeat.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com> wrote:
> Hi Marty
>
> Have to agree with yo on this one.
>
> I don't know how many times I've called a station and got LFK454JJL5KJ 599
> 03.
>
> I had no idea who he was working. If 'W7WHY' was on the end, I'd know.
>
> Of course, then he has to send his exchange again so I don't see how that
> is
> very time saving. 73
> Tom W7WHY
>
>
> I normally don't like to get drawn into this type of discussions; but going
> to make an exception on this thread.
>
> I have to agree with both Dick and Jim on this one. With the congestion on
> the bands, not sending the calling stations card with the report is
> uncalled
> for. If the 20 nanoseconds is that important to you, so be it. Have at it.
>
> My solution is very simple : My operating is 99% S&P, if I come across a
> station who is sending nothing but the report fine, this station obviously
> does not need my contact nor possibly the WV multiplier. I will tune pass
> you and your score will be down one qso. But hey, you've gained 20
> nanoseconds. Wow!
>
> Have a good day and see you in the contest; but only if you are sending a
> full exchange.
>
> 73
> Marty
> W8AKS
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of jim
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 13:16
> To: 'Dick White'; 'RTTY Contesting'
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS
>
> I think u are 100% correct with these very short exchanges.
>
>
> Collecting more taxes than is absolutely necessary is legalized robbery.
> "Calvin Coolidge" 30th Pres of U.S.A(1923-1929)
>
> from the shack of
> WB5AAA
> 73 de JIM
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Dick White
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:11 PM
> To: RTTY Contesting
> Subject: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS
>
> I had some fun in the BARTG SPRINT> Worked 186 Q's and a score of 49,104
> points.
>
> There were two posts about the BARTG exchange that I disagree with. Both
> operators stated all they need from a call was the serial number. They did
> not want the call sign. I sent NR NR NR KS0M as my exchange in S&P. Here is
> one reason why sending only the serial number can be a problem. The band
> was
> crowded, I answered a call, when he replied all I got was "KS0" and callers
> on each side of him blasted his reply and I could not copy. I sent "AGN
> AGN". Due to the QRM I never got his exchange. I use a 250 HZ filter in
> contests and the two close by calls were on the edge of my band pass. I was
> going to call him again but then I copied him sending "TU KS0M QRZ BARTG"
> He
> evidently copied the exchange of one of the other close by station who sent
> a serial number only. I did not send an exchange. Had the one sending a
> number only exchange added hic call, the op I was trying to work would have
> realized it was not from me. As a result, he is not in my log, I lost a
> contact and he will lose a contact because and maybe be penalized because
> he
> is not in my log. We both wasted out time.
> You can keep you exchange too short. I want to make sure in an exchange
> that
> we both know who we are working.
>
> 73 Dick KS0M
>
> Richard C. "Dick" White
> Fulton, MO. 65251 U.S.A.
> whiter26@sbcglobal.net
>
> Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply.
> Speak kindly. Leave the rest to GOD.
>
> Amateur Radio Station - KS0M
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|