Hello Hisaami, it is good to know that Japanese stations can operate RTTY
7100-7125 kHz. Hope to see you there.
Yes, by all means, let others know about working RTTY above 7100 kHz.
Merry Christmas!
73, Don AA5AU
----- Original Message ----
From: 7L4IOU <ncb02761@nifty.com>
To: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; RTTY@contesting.com
Sent: Thu, December 23, 2010 10:04:47 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RU-NAQP Conflict
Hi Don
>REMEMBER, IN THE USA WE CAN NOW OPERATE RTTY BETWEEN 7100-7125 kHz. I've not
>heard RTTY up
>
It's a good idea.
We also have the same segment for RTTY as "NB All Modes" and it actually
uses for domestics Digital QSOs.
http://www.jarl.or.jp/English/ 6_Band_Plan/
JapaneseAmateurBandplans20090330.pdf
I want to try in RTTY RU.
May I QSP your idea to my friends by our mailing list?
http://groups.yahoo.co.jp/group/RTTY_Contest_Info/
73 Hisaami 7L4IOU
>The biggest impact should be on 40 meters. I plan on staying high in the
>band above 7080. Actually I normally operate up there anyway during all
>Roundups when the 2nd radio is on 20 meters. I've had a lot of calls from EU
>up there so you don't have to be low to work EU on 40 meters. Running SO2R,
>when operating above 7080 kHz, the harmonic on 20 meters is above 14160 kHz
>so there is less interference between the 2 radios when operating 20 and 40
>at the same time.
>
>REMEMBER, IN THE USA WE CAN NOW OPERATE RTTY BETWEEN 7100-7125 kHz. I've not
>heard RTTY up there yet. We should take advantage of this space and I hope
>we see RTTY signals there during Roundup. I'll certain go up there.
>
>Unfortunately we lost RTTY above 3600 kHz on 80 meters so there may be more
>of an impact on 80 this year as compared to previous years when both contests
>ran the same weekend. I guess we'll see.
>
>73, Don AA5AU
>
>--- On Wed, 12/15/10, K1FWE <k1fwe@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> From: K1FWE <k1fwe@earthlink.net>
>> Subject: [RTTY] RU-NAQP Conflict
>> To: RTTY@contesting.com
>> Date: Wednesday, December 15, 2010, 6:05 AM
>> Now that the decision has been made,
>> I think the more positive response would be to figure out
>> ways to minimize the negative impact to both contests. Some
>> thoughts:
>>
>> I'm going to assume that the high bands will be less
>> impacted (20, 15, 10) will represent less of a problem for
>> RTTY contesters that 40 and 80. So concentrating more on
>> these bands when they are open might make sense.
>>
>> RU requires 6 hours of off time during the 30-hour contest
>> period. So, I plan to take those during the overlap period
>> leaving only 6 hours of RU operating during which I would
>> have to deal with NAQP contesters
>>
>> On 40M I'm going to assume that there will be fewer NAQPers
>> around 7080 than 7040
>>
>> Other thoughts anyone?
>>
>> CU in the RU
>>
>> John
>> K1FWE
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|