| To: | <dezrat@copper.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse... |
| From: | "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:50:34 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
W6WRT writes: > Agreed. As I recall, the "TS" class addresses mainly antennas, not > radios. Correct me if I am wrong. You're correct ... the point is that it is not particularly popular with many "TS eligible" stations choosing to submit in the broader "single operator" category anyway. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse..., Bill Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY, Bill Turner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse..., Bill Turner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the SO2R horse..., Rich Pieniaszek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |