On 1/13/06, Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> wrote:
> How about calling it an "open protocol" instead of a "free protocol?"
Because there is a difference. Just because a protocol is published
doesn't mean it is free to use. The publisher retains the copyright
and can license its use in whatever form he wants.
Absolutely the protocol should be open, but we have to be just as sure
that its use remains royalty free.
--
Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail | Travel by Train!
"They that can give up essential Liberty to
obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|