On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> In general the most objectionable portions of the ARRL proposal
> are:
>
> 1) the lack of required "listen before transmit" protocols
> for any station which automatically responds to calls
> (also known as "semi-automatic operation").
Indeed.
> 2) the lack of a requirement that all digital protocols be
> published and freely available in working form to enable
> monitoring and "self-policing"
Oh, yeah.
> 3) the lack of bandwidth regulation in 160 meters
Oh, no. That's how it should be. And perhaps should be on every band,
like every other country in the entire world.
> 4) the wideband allocation on 30 meters.
About doggone time.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
-- Wilbur Wright, 1901
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|