RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: [RTTY] Pet Peeve

To: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Re: [RTTY] Pet Peeve
From: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:15:10 -0400
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

At 10:25 PM 18/10/2004, W4UK wrote: <snip>

I agree that a separator at the end of a buffer is needed. I also have spaces at the end of all my buffers to make sure my text is clear. They are sent by WL. I would never have guessed that software would strip out any trailing spaces. Maybe so in a CW macro, but not RTTY. Can you tell us which programs would strip them? Should be easy to check this - just put one char at the front of a long macro of spaces and see what happens when you send it.

Hmmm ... I seem to remember someone once naming a popular program that did this, but I'll be darned if I can find the message now, so maybe my memory is playing tricks on me. I just tried it out with the N1MM/MMTTY combination on AFSK, and it sends trailing spaces. I don't have Writelog, so can't test that. I suppose it may also depend on whether you are using MMTTY or a TNC...


Anyway, I figure that the total number of QSOs I make in a contest is limited by the number of stations who can hear me, which in most RTTY contests is far fewer than the number I could possibly work at a maximum rate. In other words, whether a perfect QSO takes 15 seconds or 16 seconds will probably make little or no difference to my score, but if each QSO were to take 30 seconds or a minute instead of 15 seconds due to extra repeats, waits, etc., that might just cut into my total depending on how long that particular band is open - so I tend to prefer slightly longer messages which reduce the likelihood of requests for repeats.

73,
Rich VE3IAY




_______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>